Tuesday, February 23, 2016

The Levy Analogy: My Story, Seeing the power of Big $$$


The Levy Analogy: My Story
Seeing the power of Big $$$

By Richard S. Galloway,
WeDontHaveFreeSpeech@outlook.com

Imagine Congress surrounded by a levy – a very high, impenetrable wall made of money – with those who provide that money on the “protected” inside and all the rest of us on the outside floundering in the flood. Since the beginning of the Great Recession, we’ve lost our homes, our jobs, our benefits, our retirement funds, our marriages … If you need a reminder, see the movie “The Big Short.


Then ask yourself: When it comes time for Congress to do the government's work…the people's work...to create the laws which are supposed to serve and protect the public, who has access and their ear? You know who; and you can’t un-know what you know.  If the way Big Money corrupts our political world doesn’t make you furious, why for heaven’s sake not? 

My Personal Story: Seeing the corrupting influence of Big $$$ in our politics.
My first personal experience to see Big $$$ actually working with my own eyes was over thirty-five years ago. The issue has been up close and personal ever since. I can tell you for sure, the more I have looked,…the more public issues I’ve worked on, the more clearly I have come to see there are very few exceptions anywhere. This is how it works.

I was with a group of about twenty ordinary citizens who had come to Washington at our own expense to plead for our Congressman’s support of a critical  issue  very much in the public interest.. 

So as the Constitution guarantees, being good citizens we “assembled peacefully” in Washington to “petition our Representative to redress of our grievances.” We had called well in advance making an appointment and were promised at least fifteen minutes to present our case.

We sat in his foyer for several hours past our appointed time as one after another well-healed lobbyists came in and whispered in the receptionist's ear. They were immediately ushered into our Congressman's office and remained for long periods of time. Their laughter through the door made it sound like they were having a drunken party in there. When we were finally "allowed" in, our Congressman apologized that he was “so busy” that he could only give us five minutes to present our very complex issue – two of which he spent on the phone assuring what was clearly a business interest that they had his total support. 

We ended up with about two minutes to tell him why we were there. At that point he abruptly interrupted our presenter in the middle of a sentence, and rose to usher us out while offering his platitude that he would “look into it.” Okay, that was credible.
I have no doubt: That’s how it works enough of the time to insure that private interests overwhelm the public good. Their levy of Big $$$ protects their own interests from “We the people” barricaded on the outside –  unseen and unheard. That’s how it works. Bottom line: “We Don’t Have Free Speech. We Can’t Afford It.”
Will you help start this effort by signing our petition?

Thank you.
Richard S. Galloway 

WeDontHaveFreeSpeech@outlook.com  




Annotated Table of Contents

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/sign-the-pledge-big-out?source=c.em&r_by=14960502
Insist candidates vote for a single act of Congress stating: “There is no relationship between speech and money stated or implied in the US Constitution and therefore no such relationship exists” as the basis of further reforms to limit the abuses of Big Money interests.
Best summary of the proposed “Recover our Democracy Act;” its Constitutional basis; removing purported legal objections, public financing of elections, limits on campaign contributions, public funding of federal elections, preprogrammed campaign website, redefining a bribe and much more
Cut and paste text to share by electronic media to spread the word on our plan
Our appointment being ignored while lobbyists immediately enter our Congressman’s office
Being on the outside: Explaining the meaning of our logo…the corrupting influence of Big Money
Political contributions, Citizens United Supreme Court Decision,  “We don’t have free speech. We can’t afford it,” our solution is an act of Congress,
 “Backdoor money in politics, quid pro quo,  “anything of material value offered or given to, or received and accepted by any candidate, incumbent or governmental employee under any circumstance shall be defined as a bribe,” penalties defined for candidates and government employees.
Our early commentaries: Free speech is fundamental to democracy, different views, uses and limitations of free speech, public financing of elections, fair and balanced media coverage

Original free speech: freedom to speak our mind,  power to “buy” both the “content” and the “delivery” of “free” speech,  "personhood" of corporations, Supreme Court and  Citizens United, ownership of the media, points of view,  political advertising, educational content, bought speech,…

Trickle down economics, tax reductions, income disparity, deregulation, power by changing belief systems, abuses, distortions and lies, is it regulation or just bad regulation?, affording governmental programs and high taxes, millennia of struggle by the rich to retain control vs. democracy,

 85% of Democrats, 81% of Independents, and 76% of Republicans opposed Citizens United

Humans speaking their mind without fear, means of extending the reach of speech [meida], bought speech, literally “free” speech decoupled from money, power of the media, corporate personhood, limitations of free speech, campaigns and political speech, alternative communications for elections: public financing, freedom of the Internet….
Figures on campaign contributions given by largest lobbying corporations [6+ years old = pre Supepr PACs]
One of our earliest posts:We don't have free speech that has meaningful access to our own representatives. Our logo, our slogan, our chants, young adults, spreading the word on the Internet, Obama’s election, making videos,
Largely unedited, free associated ideas on framing the legislation
Free public website designed and formatted to conduct campaigns for office and public issues , FEC provided bank account, and credit cards , campaign accounting system and regulations, partial design specifications, real time public review access…
the most logical public space to allow the free flow of information on issues of public interest

understanding the power of corporations as a means of amassing power and money, the founding fathers originally rejected the existence of corporations,” corporations are not mentioned in the Constitution and have no protected rights; therefore, Congress may limit or abolish corporations as deemed necessary for the public good. Growth of corporate power, personhood of corporations and personal rights attributed to corporations , theory of 14th amendment [due process] applies to corporations,

The Levy Analogy: Background


The Levy Analogy: Background      
                                  
“We Don’t Have Free Speech. We Can’t Afford It” 

Remember this? Congress surrounded by a levy – a very high, impenetrable wall made of money – with those who provide that money on the “protected” inside and all the rest of us on the outside floundering in the flood. Previously, we reviewed that in the Great Recession, we’ve lost our homes, our jobs, our retirement funds … When it comes time for Congress to do the government's work…to create the laws  which are supposed to serve and protect the public, who has access and their ear? Those who have the money to “pay to play.” Some even call it that in public. And we decided that this whole process p…es us off big  time – as it should. And we decided that it’s time to do something about it.
Reviewing, we ask who are these Big $$$ interests inside the levy? We all know who. They are the Wall Street brokers who wrote the toxic mortgages, bundled and refinanced them hiding the fact they were worthless…, paid the trusted ratings agencies to give them AAA ratings, inflated their prices based on false ratings, took their money off the top as commissions, sold their holdings at what they knew was the top of the market and left the rest of us holding the empty bag when their house of cards collapsed tearing the world economy apart. They are also the ones who took our bailout tax dollars and then gave themselves $20 billion in bonuses
The people on the inside of the levy have many faces. 

They are the medical establishment who wrote the only form of health insurance which could pass Congress giving us the most expensive care in the world but rated by the World Health Organization as 37th among developed nations for quality of care. 

They are the Military Industrial Complex, Big Energy, Big Chemicals, Big Agriculture, Big Banks and Credit Institutions…the handful at the top are making Billions in salaries, benefits, stock options and bonuses while our salaries fall, benefits disappear, jobs get exported, and safety net programs cut. They are heartless, remorseless and have greed that cannot be satisfied. 

In the time since the start of the Great Recession, their abusive power has only grown worse as the income gap soars. The list of ways Big $$$ abuses goes on, but you know the rest. Worst of all, they have many of us convinced that everyone except themselves are to blame.

One of Big $$$’s best investments is the political process. Many companies spend more on “lobbying” than advertising, research and development or other actions which would have a direct positive impact on their corporation’s bottom line. Their political investments works great for both the corporations and corrupt politicians. For a proportionately tiny investment, laws are passed and contracts awarded whose value measures in the $ Billions. 

The few laws and regulations that were designed to protect public interests have been gutted,  enforcement reduced to near zero or repealed altogether. Other regulations often disguised as in the public interest have been passed that protect their own interests from competition, legal liability for their destructive practices, taxes and other ways few know about or can understand.  

But best of all, our elected representatives and public employees know when their time in “public service” is done, not only do they walk away with the best retireent plan and health care fully paid by our tax dollars, but also have cushy jobs they can retire to in the industries they treated favorably while in office. It's called the revolving door.


I want to make it clear at this point that it is not government itself that is the enemy. That’s what Big $$$ wants you to believe. The power elite have been successfully selling that line for at least 35 years. One of the primary functions of properly working government is to act in the public interest and defend against encroachments by those who abuse the public trust. Big $$$ wants small government because it leaves them free of any laws or regulations and/or enforcement that limit their ability to selfishly do exactly as they please. 

The problem is not the government. It is government which is owned and controlled by Big $$$ interests, the richest 1%. Please, from right to left wing we need to understand this distinction and unite to remove the powers that distort and abuse us all.

According to a Washington Post-ABC News poll taken shortly after the 2010 Citizens United Sulpreme Court decision, 76% of Republicans, 81% of independents, and 84% of Democrats opposed this ruling. We were angry then, but we forgot and went back to sleep never having taken the necessary steps to end this situation. How long are we going to continue to be that irresponsible? Yes, that’s you and me and everyone who is not in the top 1%. Potentially this is the one issue that can unite us all from hard right wing to hard left against our common enemy who own and abuse both our body politic and our economy. This strong opposition needs to be rekindled so that we can fundamentally change the way our government works.

If the public can be energized to insert this issue at the center of every office and issue in every election and then vote accordingly, we can totally break the power of Big $$$ over our government this election cycle. If they can’t frighten us…if they can’t fool us…if they can’t buy our vote, we can do this. You in?  Or do you doubt it can be done? It’s OK to be a bit skeptical at this point. I would be if I were you. Just don’t let your skepticism turn you off before you have examined the proposals and decided for yourself.

In our next installment we will begin to describe the fundamentals of how we can most easily and completely remove this blight upon the American political process. In the mean time, I have a few questions for you. Are you p…sed about what Big $$$ is doing to us? Are you ready to do your own small part in the process of changing this completely? OK, so did you do your homework assignment and repost, email your friends and public service organizations, talked to friends and family? If not, I ask again, please, we can do this, but only if we can awaken a majority of American voters and get them engaged. So please make sure you have sent out the first position paper with the links for the rest of the series.
Thank you.
Richard S. Galloway
WeDontHaveFreeSpeech@outlook.com
p.s. If you want to read or share our complete introductory series and other blog posts about this and other issues,  follow this link to our We Don’t Have FreeSpeech blogsite. Or if you have questions or comments, email us.      
Annotated Table of Contents

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/sign-the-pledge-big-out?source=c.em&r_by=14960502
Insist candidates vote for a single act of Congress stating: “There is no relationship between speech and money stated or implied in the US Constitution and therefore no such relationship exists” as the basis of further reforms to limit the abuses of Big Money interests.
Best summary of the proposed “Recover our Democracy Act;” its Constitutional basis; removing purported legal objections, public financing of elections, limits on campaign contributions, public funding of federal elections, preprogrammed campaign website, redefining a bribe and much more
Cut and paste text to share by electronic media to spread the word on our plan
Our appointment being ignored while lobbyists immediately enter our Congressman’s office
Being on the outside: Explaining the meaning of our logo…the corrupting influence of Big Money
Political contributions, Citizens United Supreme Court Decision,  “We don’t have free speech. We can’t afford it,” our solution is an act of Congress,
 “Backdoor money in politics, quid pro quo,  “anything of material value offered or given to, or received and accepted by any candidate, incumbent or governmental employee under any circumstance shall be defined as a bribe,” penalties defined for candidates and government employees.
Our early commentaries: Free speech is fundamental to democracy, different views, uses and limitations of free speech, public financing of elections, fair and balanced media coverage

Original free speech: freedom to speak our mind,  power to “buy” both the “content” and the “delivery” of “free” speech,  "personhood" of corporations, Supreme Court and  Citizens United, ownership of the media, points of view,  political advertising, educational content, bought speech,…

Trickle down economics, tax reductions, income disparity, deregulation, power by changing belief systems, abuses, distortions and lies, is it regulation or just bad regulation?, affording governmental programs and high taxes, millennia of struggle by the rich to retain control vs. democracy,

 85% of Democrats, 81% of Independents, and 76% of Republicans opposed Citizens United

Humans speaking their mind without fear, means of extending the reach of speech [meida], bought speech, literally “free” speech decoupled from money, power of the media, corporate personhood, limitations of free speech, campaigns and political speech, alternative communications for elections: public financing, freedom of the Internet….
Figures on campaign contributions given by largest lobbying corporations [6+ years old = pre Supepr PACs]
One of our earliest posts:We don't have free speech that has meaningful access to our own representatives. Our logo, our slogan, our chants, young adults, spreading the word on the Internet, Obama’s election, making videos,
Largely unedited, free associated ideas on framing the legislation
Free public website designed and formatted to conduct campaigns for office and public issues , FEC provided bank account, and credit cards , campaign accounting system and regulations, partial design specifications, real time public review access…
the most logical public space to allow the free flow of information on issues of public interest
understanding the power of corporations as a means of amassing power and money, the founding fathers originally rejected the existence of corporations,” corporations are not mentioned in the Constitution and have no protected rights; therefore, Congress may limit or abolish corporations as deemed necessary for the public good. Growth of corporate power, personhood of corporations and personal rights attributed to corporations , theory of 14th amendment [due process] applies to corporations,




GET BIG $$$ out of politics NOW


GET BIG $$$ out of politics NOW

As they currently are, political campaigns are enormously long and expensive. Most candidates are totally dependent on Big $$$’s huge contributions without which success is impossible…so large that individual contributions from voters cannot stand up their power. “Relatively honest” politicians admit that they spend more than 50% of their time soliciting contributions. Can there be any doubt large contributions necessarily bias our representatives’ relationship to the interests of their largest contributors? Bottom line: If you can’t pay Big $$$ to play, your concerns are highly unlikely to even be heard, let alone considered.

Since the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling affirms that “money is speech” and “corporate money” curiously has “free” speech, this process is locked in place despite the fact that it is entirely contrary to the language and intent of the Constitution. The Court’s understanding is an “imaginary legal construct” which defies any reasonable justification under the Constitution.

Thus we rally with “We don’t have free speech. We can’t afford it.” This is more than just a slogan. The political process is so bought and paid for that our vote has become largely worthless.  It’s time for voters to fix this problem once and for all by telling our candidates: “You’re either with us, or we’re against you. Pledge to sponsor and support our proposed law banning big money from politics or lose our vote.” Why is it so important to make this the central issue in this year’s elections? Because our success on all other public issues rests on breaking the power of Big $$$. Rightwing, Independent or Left makes no difference if our voices are not being heard.

Democracy necessarily takes effort and demands that we voters become educated to the important issues and candidates,… and then to vote on the basis of that knowledge. The hard truth is that if we don’t do our part, we will get the kind of government we have now. So here’s the hard question: Have you begun to study the various proposals of the many organizations who are fighting to break the power of Big $$$ by ending Citizens United? OK, grant that there’s a ton of organizations and ideas. So it is necessary that we need to bring all this energy together in consensus. If it is to work, our goal of defeating Big $$$ must be comprehensive,… simple,… readily understood… and far easier to accomplish than most groups imagine.

We are offering a comprehensive plan for everyone’s consideration: In a nutshell,
  1.  It can be accomplished by the far simpler Act of Congress as opposed to a Constitutional Amendment.
  2.  With the stroke of a pen, it nullifies the Gordian knot of existing election regulations, laws and court opinions used to justify the status quo.
  3.  It redefines bribery in a way that you will say “Yes, that’s what we need.” Watch for this.

There’s more that can be added, but that’s the necessary core to Get Big $$$ out of our political process. Details will follow. Before anything else is asked of you, will you please spend a little time to read and understand the suggestions and decide if you agree that this is a path you can support? Only if you agree, will you be asked to help make this a central issue in this year’s elections.

If everyone who agrees that this issue is indispensable to renewing our American democratic principles does their part to spread the word and support this effort, it is possible to remove the power of Big $$$ within the coming Presidential election cycle. In the meantime if you agree, please like and share these posts with everyone you can and forward it to all your candidates and favorite public interest organizations. We can get this started right now.

Thank you.
Richard S. Galloway 

p.s. If you want to read or share our complete introductory series and other blog posts about this and other issues,  see our Annotated  Table of Contents. Or if you have questions or comments, email us.      


Annotated Table of Contents

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/sign-the-pledge-big-out?source=c.em&r_by=14960502
Insist candidates vote for a single act of Congress stating: “There is no relationship between speech and money stated or implied in the US Constitution and therefore no such relationship exists” as the basis of further reforms to limit the abuses of Big Money interests.
Best summary of the proposed “Recover our Democracy Act;” its Constitutional basis; removing purported legal objections, public financing of elections, limits on campaign contributions, public funding of federal elections, preprogrammed campaign website, redefining a bribe and much more
Cut and paste text to share by electronic media to spread the word on our plan
Our appointment being ignored while lobbyists immediately enter our Congressman’s office
Being on the outside: Explaining the meaning of our logo…the corrupting influence of Big Money
Political contributions, Citizens United Supreme Court Decision,  “We don’t have free speech. We can’t afford it,” our solution is an act of Congress,
 “Backdoor money in politics, quid pro quo,  “anything of material value offered or given to, or received and accepted by any candidate, incumbent or governmental employee under any circumstance shall be defined as a bribe,” penalties defined for candidates and government employees.
Our early commentaries: Free speech is fundamental to democracy, different views, uses and limitations of free speech, public financing of elections, fair and balanced media coverage

Original free speech: freedom to speak our mind,  power to “buy” both the “content” and the “delivery” of “free” speech,  "personhood" of corporations, Supreme Court and  Citizens United, ownership of the media, points of view,  political advertising, educational content, bought speech,…

Trickle down economics, tax reductions, income disparity, deregulation, power by changing belief systems, abuses, distortions and lies, is it regulation or just bad regulation?, affording governmental programs and high taxes, millennia of struggle by the rich to retain control vs. democracy,

 85% of Democrats, 81% of Independents, and 76% of Republicans opposed Citizens United

Humans speaking their mind without fear, means of extending the reach of speech [meida], bought speech, literally “free” speech decoupled from money, power of the media, corporate personhood, limitations of free speech, campaigns and political speech, alternative communications for elections: public financing, freedom of the Internet….
Figures on campaign contributions given by largest lobbying corporations [6+ years old = pre Supepr PACs]
One of our earliest posts:We don't have free speech that has meaningful access to our own representatives. Our logo, our slogan, our chants, young adults, spreading the word on the Internet, Obama’s election, making videos,
Largely unedited, free associated ideas on framing the legislation
Free public website designed and formatted to conduct campaigns for office and public issues , FEC provided bank account, and credit cards , campaign accounting system and regulations, partial design specifications, real time public review access…
the most logical public space to allow the free flow of information on issues of public interest
understanding the power of corporations as a means of amassing power and money, the founding fathers originally rejected the existence of corporations,” corporations are not mentioned in the Constitution and have no protected rights; therefore, Congress may limit or abolish corporations as deemed necessary for the public good. Growth of corporate power, personhood of corporations and personal rights attributed to corporations , theory of 14th amendment [due process] applies to corporations,